
I recently had the good fortune to go away for a week's camping in Spain with a good friend of mine from my university days, who for the purposes of this blog I will refer to as 'RS'. He is the same age as me but where we differ is that he has been in a long-term relationship with his girlfriend for five years. She is the first serious girlfriend he's had and only the second person he's ever slept with.
RS regularly cautions me about my playboy behaviour - and has done ever since we've known each other. It's not a case of disapproval or of him looking down on my 'liberal' appreciation of women - in fact, I think he peers over the fence of singledom from time-to-time and is a little jealous of the fun I'm having - but on this recent trip he suggested life might be more meaningful if I 'just picked a girl and settled down with her'.
Amongst all my friends, I guess you could say I've always been the black sheep. My closest ten friends consist of five couples - include RS and his girlfriend - all of whom have been together for a long time (6 years average). Whenever we meet up - which seems to be about once every month - I'm either single or in a relationship with someone new. I almost feel like a fraud every time I introduce a new girlfriend to them:
'Oh hi! This is Jenny...she works in management consultancy but we're going to break up next week so don't get too keen...'None of them lecture me, but this time RS added just another nudge towards the view that perhaps I should settle down and see the benefits it brings.
His logic, it seems, was that although meeting women, flirting outrageously and then screwing their brains out was fun, it wasn't
meaningul. It had no purpose. Which led me to question what meaninful really is.
Meaningul - rather tautologically - means 'to have meaning or purpose', thereby implying that those in meaninful relationships are working towards a purpose of some kind and that those who meet women with no desire to settle down are lacking in this regard. But is the act of dating without commitment really purposeless? Surely dating can be an end just as much as a means?
Right now, I don't want to settle down; something that psycho GF has illustrated very clearly. Even if you strip out all her insecurities, paranoia and clinginess, she wants to settle down, find someone to marry and continue fulfilling her purpose in life: presumably to have babies and contribute to society's grand biological plan for her. But I'm The London Dater - and that's not part of my plan.
I want a girl who sticks two fingers up to biology and does the opposite to what everyone else is doing, just because they can. Someone who swims against the tide and rebels against confirmity. Not someone wild or crazy necessarily, but an out-of-the-box thinker. The marriage/baby types are really not where it's at for me.
And so, it made me smile this weekend when I came across www.spurmo.com - a site that perhaps I'll need in 6 years time. Spurmo, you will learn, means 'Single Proud Unmarried Men Over Thirty' (overlooking the fact that the acronym doesn't fit the title for one moment) and is a campaign for men who have shunned relationships and marriage to come together, bond, form an alliance and defy society's ritualistic expectations.
The question for me is: is this a good thing? Will I feel different in five years' time when I qualify to become a member? Perhaps there is something tragic about a thirty-something being a member of a club for guys like him: the sort of men who regularly go down the gym to make themselves look better, even though there is no-one within their age group left still single for them to impress?
I guess that's the danger though. And perhaps that's where RS is right.
Next?